Initial Survey on Sustainable Practices: Plastic, Pesticide Use, and Bioenzymes in Vocational Education

Introduction

Within the framework of the project, an initial survey was conducted among students and staff of participating schools. The aim was to establish a baseline of awareness, knowledge, and willingness to adopt sustainable practices related to plastic use, pesticides, bioenzymes, and zero-waste cooking. The results serve as reference data for evaluating project impact and guiding upcoming workshops and curriculum innovations.

Methods

The survey was distributed to two groups: students (aged 14–19) and teachers/administrative staff across participating institutions. Questions addressed familiarity with bioenzymes and zero-waste practices, current use of plastic and pesticides, and willingness to undergo training and change behavior. Responses were measured on a 1–5 Likert scale (1 = not willing at all, 5 = completely willing) and through categorical questions on awareness.

Results

  • Students (N = 67)
    • Training willingness: 3.7/5
    • Willingness to reduce plastic and pesticide use: 3.9/5
    • Willingness to apply zero-waste cooking: 4.1/5
    • Familiarity with bioenzymes: 39%
    • Familiarity with zero-waste cooking: 76%
  • Teachers and staff (N = 28)
    • Training willingness: 4.3/5
    • Willingness to reduce plastic and pesticide use: 4.6/5
    • Willingness to apply zero-waste cooking: 4.5/5
    • Familiarity with bioenzymes: 71%
    • Familiarity with zero-waste cooking: 71%

Plastic Use Frequency

  • Students (N = 67)
    • Daily: 40%
    • Several times a week: 31%
    • Rarely: 27%
    • Never: 1%
  • Teachers and staff (N = 28)
    • Daily: 14%
    • Several times a week: 39%
    • Rarely: 39%
    • Never: 7%

Average Weekly Plastic Items Used

  • Students
    • 0–5 items: 61%
    • 6–10 items: 30%
    • 11–20 items: 9%
  • Teachers/Staff
    • 0–5 items: 71%
    • 6–10 items: 18%
    • 11–20 items: 7%
    • More than 20 items: 4%

Discussion

Teachers and staff show consistently higher awareness and willingness to adopt eco-friendly practices, especially in the use of bioenzymes. Students, however, display strong openness to zero-waste cooking, with 76% already familiar with the concept and an average willingness of 4.1/5 to apply it. The largest gap is in bioenzyme awareness (39% of students vs. 71% of staff), highlighting a key training need.

Interpretation of the initial survey provides more analytical data:

  • Students are almost three times more likely than staff to use plastic daily (40% vs. 14%).
  • Teachers are more likely to limit usage to rare occasions (39% vs. 27%) or not at all (7% vs. 1%).
  • When counting weekly items, staff are generally lighter users: 71% report 0–5 items per week compared to 61% of students.
  • Students show a higher proportion using 6–10 or 11–20 items weekly, indicating greater contribution to school waste streams.

Conclusion

These findings provide a baseline for evaluating project impact. Planned workshops on bioenzymes, eco-packaging, and zero-waste practices will directly address knowledge gaps while leveraging the high motivation of both groups. Post-project surveys will allow comparison with this baseline to measure changes in knowledge, skills, and sustainable practices.